🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some participants experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."